News
The Right to Know in the European Union: Comparative Study on Access to Classified Data in National Security Related Immigration Cases
Today has seen the release of a study on the use of national security and public policy reasons in immigration related decisions across Europe.
The result of an almost year-long intense working process and very unique cooperation between lawyers from across Europe, including from the Immigrant Council of Ireland and the Hungarian and Helsinki Committee. This report highlights some key findings:
- State security considerations play a key role in immigration-related proceedings: a foreign national who poses a threat to national security is not granted the right to enter or reside from any EU Member State concerned. The threat to national security is assessed by the administration, on the basis of data which are generally classified and to which the foreign national has access only in exceptional cases and to a certain extent.
- The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) stipulated certain minimum safeguards concerning these national security cases with regard to the right to an effective remedy. Despite the safeguards laid out by the courts, national practices of the Member States of the European Union vary and in numerous cases do not align with the jurisprudence of the courts.
- Recently, however, no comprehensive research has been conducted as to how the issue of applicants’ right to know and their right to access classified information are regulated in the Member States of the European Union, and whether national frameworks are in line with European standards. This comparative pan-European mapping study aims to fill this gap. The study gives a comparative analysis of the laws and practices of EU Member States concerning their compliance with the standards laid out by the ECtHR and CJEU jurisprudence on invoking national security grounds in immigration cases, as well as the scope and effectiveness of the remedy provided against administrative decisions in such cases.
To read this study in full, please find the direct link here: